Verify Excel Math
Learn how investment professionals save time and increase confidence with a completely new way to check legacy Excel models.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3abe9/3abe9061b62ddebeee669f036eb77cd06a82d2be" alt="Mosaic"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dff2d/dff2d991ebdd487d90a2f56114e4e6e47dad7c2b" alt="An entirely new way to review models"
An entirely new way to review models
Few kudos are awarded for accurate models - but errors certainly get senior attention.
Welcome to the "downside-only" task of model checking.
When we were in your seat, the only way we could be 100% confident in a model's accuracy was to build one of our own on the side.
That's what Mosaic solves for - cross check an Excel model to our independent system in a few minutes and either (i) confirm its accuracy or (ii) quickly surface and address errors.
The only way to be 100% sure a model is right is to re-run it through an independent system
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfe16/dfe16909039ba5bb6617fea03f87101b8c9b2f74" alt="Quickly and confidently validate model math"
Quickly and confidently validate model math
Manually checking each cell in Excel is a nightmare alternative. We’ve studied dozens of final round bid models and counted an average of 50,000 populated cells per model.
Even glancing at each cell for 1 second would require a staggering 14 hours of review time (which no one would ever do). So what’s the practical alternative today without Mosaic?
High-level checks of a subset of the model with high probability of an error slipping through.
Running Mosaic is the first thing I do when I receive a new model to review and the last thing I do before sharing with my MD.
If the outputs line up perfectly – or if I understand and accept why they don’t – I have full confidence in my Associate’s model.
Achieving that level of certainty without Mosaic used to take me hours.
The only thing worse than building Excel models is reviewing them...